Assignment content complete the hewlett-packard case study analysis.

Assignment Content

1. Complete the Hewlett-Packard Case Study Analysis.
   Submit your analysis.
   Prepare a 7- to 10-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint®, Prezi, or Microsoft® Sway®presentation describing your analysis of the Hewlett-Packard Case Study. Describe how you addressed the five (5) Case Study topics/questions.Please be prepared to present your analysis and recommendation in class on Week 6.
   Please Note:50% of your grade will be your written analysis (see breakdown below) 25% Microsoft® Word document 25% Microsoft® PowerPoint®, Prezi, or Microsoft® Sway® presentation50% of your grade will be your Verbal Presentation in Class on Week 6Wk 6 – Apply: Hewlett-Packard Case Study Analysis [due Mon]Rubric Details
   Maximum Score130 points
   • Supertrends
     15% of total gradeOutstanding Achievement Comprehensive and in-depth identification of supertrends included and skillfully tied in with the elements of the case. 19.5Very Good Work Identification of supertrends included and appropriately identified as change drivers. 16.6Average Work Identification of supertrends included but were underdeveloped. 14.6Unacceptable Work Identification of supertrends missing or inadequate. 9.8
   • Forces of Organizational Change
     15% of total gradeOutstanding Achievement Forces for organizational change were thoroughly identified and explanation was well developed and insightful.19.5Very Good Work Forces for organizational change were appropriately identified and explanation was well developed. 16.6Average Work Forces for organizational change were identified, but explanation was minimal.14.6Unacceptable Work Forces for organizational change were not properly identified or the explanation was illogical or missing. 9.8
   • Use of Lewin’s and Kotter’s Models
     15% of total gradeOutstanding Achievement Recommendations of models as potential change drivers were well developed and insightful. 19.5Very Good Work Recommendations of models as potential change drivers were appropriately addressed. 16.6Average Work Recommendations of models as potential change drivers were addressed, but explanation was minimal. 14.6Unacceptable Work Recommendations of models as potential change drivers were illogical or missing.9.8
   • Fostering Innovation
     15% of total gradeOutstanding Achievement In-depth assessment of HP’s adherence to fostering innovation was complete and well developed. 19.5Very Good Work Description and explanation of HP’s fostering innovation was sufficiently accomplished. 16.6Average Work Description and explanation of HP’s fostering innovation was minimally accomplished. 14.6Unacceptable Work Description and explanation of HP’s fostering innovation was not done or was done poorly. 9.8
   • Advice for HP
     15% of total gradeOutstanding Achievement Student’s advice for HP was insightful and valuable. 19.5Very Good Work Student’s advice for HP was appropriately and thoughtfully communicated. 16.6Average Work Student’s advice for HP included, but was underdeveloped. 14.6Unacceptable Work Student’s advice for HP non-existent or minimal. 9.8
   • Tone
     9% of total gradeOutstanding Achievement Tone and level of discussion exemplify high level of ability to communicate in academic writing. 11.7Very Good Work Tone and level of discussion is at an appropriate level. 9.9Average Work Tone and level of discussion is approaching expected level, but writing should be elevated.8.8Unacceptable Work Tone and level of discussion is not appropriate to the content and assignment. 5.9
   • Sentence Structure
     8% of total gradeOutstanding Achievement Answers are fully organized in a logical and coherent manner; transitions are smooth and flow seamlessly from one point to the next. 10.4Very Good Work Answers are generally organized in a logical and coherent manner; transitions for the most part are smooth. 8.8Average Work Answers are generally organized in a logical and coherent manner; transitions, however, are awkward. 7.8Unacceptable Work Answers are organized in a logical or coherent manner, but not both. 5.2
   • Grammar
     8% of total grade
   • Must Read: Please read instructions carefully

I sent you a power point that another tutor did which was not a good grade, a lot of info was left out maybe cuz they didn’t read the instructions carefully, the power point looked good just didn’t contain the info that was needed2 Attachments