Prospectous for Information Security and Assuarance


Prospectous for Information Security and Assuarance
Task:
Develop a prospectus for your project in which you complete the following:
A. Summarize in an abstract (suggested length of 200 words) the important prospectus points. Include the following points:
1. Business/IT problem under investigation
2. Plan
3. Research methodology
4. Implementation proposal
5. Proposed outcomes
B. Summarize in an introduction (suggested length of 6 pages) the capstone’s highlights. Include the following:
1. The scope of the project
2. Your rationale for choosing this project
3. A problem statement
4. The background of the problem
5. The need for this solution
6. Your reasons for the chosen approach
7. The organization of the prospectus
C. Summarize in a business statement or an IT problem statement (suggested length of 3 pages) the components of the problem. Include the following:
1. Background information of the problem
2. Causes of the problem
3. Business impacts of the problem
4. Cost analysis
Note: The cost analysis should deal with the costs of the implementation of the solution, not the costs incurred because of the problem.
5. Risk analysis
Note: The risk analysis should deal with the risks of the implementation of the solution, not the risks incurred because of the problem.
6. Assumptions about the problem
7. Limitations of the problem
8. Technical terms used in the statement
D. Explain (suggested length of 5 pages) why a technology solution is needed.
1. Discuss the business drivers (i.e., important and relevant business factors).
a. Justify the importance of the business drivers.
2. Discuss what could happen if no technology solution were implemented.
3. Justify the technology solution within business priorities.
E. When you use sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format.
Note: When bulleted points are present in the task prompt, the level of detail or support called for in the rubric refers to those bulleted points.
Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the Rubric Terms web link included in the Evaluation Procedures section.
Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in a paper or project, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the paper or project.
Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. For tips on using APA style, please refer to the APA Handout web link included in the General Instructions section.
Rubric
LQT2 Capstone Prospectus
value: 0.00 value: 1.00 value: 2.00 value: 3.00 value: 4.00 Score/Level
Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics) The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response. The candidate provides weak articulation of response. The candidate provides limited articulation of response. The candidate provides adequate articulation of response. The candidate provides substantial articulation of response.
A1. Problem The candidate does not provide in the abstract a logical summary of the business/IT problem under investigation. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with no detail, of the business/IT problem under investigation. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with limited detail, of the business/IT problem under investigation. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the business/IT problem under investigation. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the business/IT problem under investigation.
A2. Plan The candidate does not provide in the abstract a logical summary of the plan. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with no detail, of the plan. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with limited detail, of the plan. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the plan. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the plan.
A3. Methodology The candidate does not provide in the abstract a logical summary of the research methodology. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with no detail, of the research methodology. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with limited detail, of the research methodology. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the research methodology. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the research methodology.
A4. Implementation Proposal The candidate does not provide in the abstract a logical summary of the implementation proposal. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with no detail, of the implementation proposal. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with limited detail, of the implementation proposal. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the implementation proposal. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the implementation proposal.
A5. Outcomes The candidate does not provide in the abstract a logical summary of the proposed outcomes. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with no detail, of the proposed outcomes. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with limited detail, of the proposed outcomes. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the proposed outcomes. The candidate provides in the abstract a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the proposed outcomes.
B1. Project Scope The candidate does not provide in the introduction a logical summary of the scope of the project. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with no detail, of the scope of the project. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with limited detail, of the scope of the project. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the scope of the project. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the scope of the project.
B2. Project Rationale The candidate does not provide in the introduction a logical summary of the rationale for choosing the project. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with no detail, of the rationale for choosing the project. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with limited detail, of the rationale for choosing the project. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the rationale for choosing the project. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the rationale for choosing the project.
B3. Problem Summary The candidate does not provide in the introduction a logical summary of the problem statement. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with no detail, of the problem statement. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with limited detail, of the problem statement. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the problem statement. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the problem statement.
B4. Problem Background The candidate does not provide in the introduction a logical summary of the background of the problem. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with no detail, of the background of the problem. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with limited detail, of the background of the problem. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the background of the problem. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the background of the problem.
B5. Need for the Solution The candidate does not provide in the introduction a logical summary of the need for the solution. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with no detail, of the need for the solution. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with limited detail, of the need for the solution. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the need for the solution. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the need for the solution.
B6. Reason for Approach The candidate does not provide in the introduction a logical summary of the reasons for the chosen approach. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with no detail, of the reasons for the chosen approach. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with limited detail, of the reasons for the chosen approach. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the reasons for the chosen approach. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the reasons for the chosen approach.
B7. Prospectus Organization The candidate does not provide in the introduction a logical summary of the organization of the prospectus. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with no detail, of the organization of the prospectus. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with limited detail, of the organization of the prospectus. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the organization of the prospectus. The candidate provides in the introduction a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the organization of the prospectus.
C1. Background Information The candidate does not provide in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary of the background information of the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with no detail, of the background information of the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with limited detail, of the background information of the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the background information of the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the background information of the problem.
C2. Causes The candidate does not provide in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary of the causes of the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with no detail, of the causes of the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with limited detail, of the causes of the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the causes of the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the causes of the problem.
C3. Business Impacts The candidate does not provide in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary of the business impacts of the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with no detail, of the business impacts of the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with limited detail, of the business impacts of the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the business impacts of the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the business impacts of the problem.
C4. Cost Analysis The candidate does not provide in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary of the cost analysis. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with no detail, of the cost analysis. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with limited detail, of the cost analysis. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the cost analysis. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the cost analysis.
C5. Risk Analysis The candidate does not provide in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary of the risk analysis. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with no detail, of the risk analysis. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with limited detail, of the risk analysis. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the risk analysis. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the risk analysis.
C6. Assumptions The candidate does not provide in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary of the assumptions about the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with no detail, of the assumptions about the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with limited detail, of the assumptions about the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the assumptions about the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the assumptions about the problem.
C7. Limitations The candidate does not provide in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary of the limitations of the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with no detail, of the limitations of the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with limited detail, of the limitations of the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the limitations of the problem. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the limitations of the problem.
C8. Terms The candidate does not provide in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary of the technical terms used in the statement. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with no detail, of the technical terms used in the statement. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with limited detail, of the technical terms used in the statement. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the technical terms used in the statement. The candidate provides in a business statement or an IT problem statement a logical summary, with substantial detail, of the technical terms used in the statement.
D. Technology Solution The candidate does not provide a logical explanation for why a technology solution is needed. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no support, for why a technology solution is needed. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited support, for why a technology solution is needed. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate support, for why a technology solution is needed. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial support, for why a technology solution is needed.
D1. Business Drivers The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the business drivers. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of the business drivers. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the business drivers. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the business drivers. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of the business drivers.
D1a. Justification The candidate does not provide a logical justification of the importance of the business drivers. The candidate provides a logical justification, with no support, of the importance of the business drivers. The candidate provides a logical justification, with limited support, of the importance of the business drivers. The candidate provides a logical justification, with adequate support, of the importance of the business drivers. The candidate provides a logical justification, with substantial support, of the importance of the business drivers.
D2. No Solution The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of what could happen if no technology solution were implemented. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no support, of what could happen if no technology solution were implemented. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited support, of what could happen if no technology solution were implemented. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate support, of what could happen if no technology solution were implemented. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial support, of what could happen if no technology solution were implemented.
D3. Solution The candidate does not provide a logical justification of the technology solution within business priorities. The candidate provides a logical justification, with no support, of the technology solution within business priorities. The candidate provides a logical justification, with limited support, of the technology solution within business priorities. The candidate provides a logical justification, with adequate support, of the technology solution within business priorities. The candidate provides a logical justification, with substantial support, of the technology solution within business priorities.
E. Sources When the candidate uses sources, the candidate does not provide in-text citations and references. When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides only some in-text citations and references. When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with major deviations from APA style. When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with minor deviations from APA style. When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with no readily detectable deviations from APA style, OR the candidate does not use sources.
Place your order now for a similar paper and have exceptional work written by our team of experts to guarantee you A Results
Why Choose US
6+ years experience on custom writing
80% Return Client
Urgent 2 Hrs Delivery
Your Privacy Guaranteed
Unlimited Free Revisions

The post Prospectous for Information Security and Assuarance appeared first on Infinite Essays.



Source link

 
"If this is not the paper you were searching for, you can order your 100% plagiarism free, professional written paper now!"
WhatsApp Inquire from us on matters homework
%d bloggers like this: