• A minimum of three peer-reviewed references published within the last 5 years is required.
•  
• Doctoral learners are required to use the current APA style for their essay writing assignments. The current APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
•  
• This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

 

Rubric Criteria

Collapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All

Professional Practice and Approach

4 points

Criteria Description

Professional Practice and Approach

5. Target

4 points

A cogent, scholarly discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is clearly explained, with relevant details and support.

4. Acceptable

3.68 points

A detailed discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is complete, with appropriate details and support.

3. Approaching

3.52 points

An introductory discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice is included, but only minimal detail or support is provided for approach.

2. Insufficient

3.2 points

A discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is not included.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is incomplete or limited.

Personal Knowledge and Skills

4 points

Criteria Description

Personal Knowledge and Skills

5. Target

4 points

A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.

4. Acceptable

3.68 points

A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is provided with appropriate details and support.

3. Approaching

3.52 points

A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is provided, but with minimal detail or support.

2. Insufficient

3.2 points

A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is incomplete or otherwise deficient.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is not included.

Additional Resources for Influencing Optimal Learning Outcomes

4 points

Criteria Description

Additional Resources for Influencing Optimal Learning Outcomes

5. Target

4 points

A clear discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided, with relevant details and support.

4. Acceptable

3.68 points

A complete discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided with appropriate details and support.

3. Approaching

3.52 points

An introductory discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided, but with minimal detail or support.

2. Insufficient

3.2 points

A discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is incomplete or otherwise deficient.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is not included.

Course Outcomes and Competencies Aligned to the Course

4 points

Criteria Description

Course Outcomes and Competencies Aligned to the Course

5. Target

4 points

A cogent, scholarly description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.

4. Acceptable

3.68 points

A complete description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is provided with appropriate details and support.

3. Approaching

3.52 points

An introductory description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is provided with minimal detail or support.

2. Insufficient

3.2 points

A description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is incomplete or otherwise deficient.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is not included.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

0.8 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target

0.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable

0.74 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

3. Approaching

0.7 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

2. Insufficient

0.64 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

0.8 points

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

5. Target

0.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable

0.74 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. Approaching

0.7 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient

0.64 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

Evidence

0.8 points

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

5. Target

0.8 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.

4. Acceptable

0.74 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.

3. Approaching

0.7 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

2. Insufficient

0.64 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

Mechanics of Writing

0.8 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target

0.8 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable

0.74 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching

0.7 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient

0.64 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

Format/Documentation

0.8 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target

0.8 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable

0.74 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching

0.7 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient

0.64 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

 

 

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

• Download the “Reflective Journal Template,” located in the DNP PI Workspace, for submission. Directions provided in the template should be followed because they align to the assignment rubric.
• A minimum of three peer-reviewed references published within the last 5 years is required.
• Doctoral learners are required to use the current APA style for their essay writing assignments. The current APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
• Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use. Failure to submit the reflective journal to both locations can result in an Incomplete for the course

 

DNP 835A   Patient Outcomes and Sustainable Change

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

• A minimum of three peer-reviewed references published within the last 5 years is required.
•  
• Doctoral learners are required to use the current APA style for their essay writing assignments. The current APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
•  
• This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric before beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
•  
• .
•  
• Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use. Failure to submit the reflective journal to both locations can result in an Incomplete for the course.

 

Years, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.