The paper addresses the outcomes of unprecedented amalgamation of care and research in pediatric oncology from the nurses and parents point of view.
Running head: PICOT STATEMENT 1
PICOT STATEMENT 2
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper NowPICOT Statement
PICOT Statement
The paper addresses the outcomes of unprecedented amalgamation of care and research in pediatric oncology from the nurses and parents point of view. A substantial number of children living with cancer register in treatment trials as a significant number of ecologist pediatrics carry out investigations in clinical research.
Patient/ population problem: The research analysis explained that both integrations of care and research have substantial consequences for consent process that is informed. Additionally, the incorporation as well impacts nurse’s duties and the interest of the children. However, the influence brings out the conflict between scientists and nurses. Parents have a strong dependency on the physicians of their children. The research hence turns hectic to achieve owing to stress emotions and research protocols complexity hence making it difficult to achieve the intended consent of the work. Parents have a duty of providing parental care to their children where they have to register them in trials. Parents to the kids are to some extent never in equipoise in taking part in trials. The situations leave them in an agony of yearning to do the best for their kids. However, parents fear wrong choices with regards to the health situations of their kids. Satisfying misapprehension jeopardizes collect participation assessment which makes parents attribute inaccurate intent to research procedures. Nurses have a strong preference to therapists than a researcher. However, nurses may believe that the investigation praises the interest of the children thus maintaining a calming misconception amongst them and the parents (Kieft, Francke & Delnoij, 2014).
Intervention: The integration of the research and care brings out intertwining of distinctive ethical perceptions in pediatric oncology daily practice. The increase in awareness of the meaning of the communication for nurses and parents is essential. Possibilities of future research should look into efforts of overcoming problems owing to care and research synchronicity.
Comparison: Children involved in the question are under the age of six years. Parents to the kids are motivated by the duty of attention and protection of their children. Parents find it hard to think of research as distinct from the best of the children. However, parents support research that may improve future patients’ chances. To parents, the participation of other kids before their cases has grown their current treatment services to their children, and hence they feel it worth giving back. However, parents have the key duty of protecting their kids, which define their attitudes towards trials. However, nurses will only make tests that are of better quality and seem to have a high chance of high-quality outcome. Nurses play a significant role in allowing the involvement of children to take part in research works. However, the nurses must first be convinced that the research work will pose no harm to the kids. Moreover, the nurses must be satisfied that the investigation will improve the health of the children (Yang, 2012).
Outcome: The results of integrated health services have prompted health facility parties to consider their choices carefully with regards to the interest of the parties involved. Nurses and parents put the interest of the children most forward while research teams ensure continued improvement of their services. Currently, the sector has recorded a constant improvement of the services and the level of research works. The teams make decisions based on what is best for the entire health status of the patients.
Time: The data collection was done in 2015 where the information is qualitative. The data collection involved interviews of the stakeholders including the parents and the nurses in some public health centers.
References
Kalyani, M. N., Kashkooli, R. I., Molazem, Z., & Jamshidi, N. (2014). Qualitative Inquiry into the Patients’ Expectations regarding Nurses and Nursing Care. Advances in Nursing, 2014, 1-6. doi: 10.1155/2014/647653
Kieft, R. A., Brouwer, B. B., Francke, A. L., & Delnoij, D. M. (2014). How nurses and their work environment affect patient experiences of the quality of care: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 249. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-249.
Stavropoulou, A., Kaba, E., Obamwonyi, V. A., Adeosun, I., Rovithis, M., & Zidianakis, Z. (2012). Defining nursing intimacy: Nurses’ perceptions of intimacy. Health Science Journal, 6(3), 17.
Yang .et aL. (2012). Psychosocial precursors and physical consequences of workplace violence towards nurses: A longitudinal examination with naturally occurring groups in hospital settings. International Journal of Nursing Studies 49 (2012) 1091-1102.
The post The paper addresses the outcomes of unprecedented amalgamation of care and research in pediatric oncology from the nurses and parents point of view appeared first on Infinite Essays.
Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.