1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00%
|
3 Satisfactory 79.00%
|
4 Good 87.00%
|
5 Excellent 100.00%
|
100.0 %Content
|
|
35.0 %Part 1: Create a Transcript of the Session
|
The transcript does not identify a specific presenting concern of the family member from the session using solution-focused language and does not identify a solution to the problem.
|
The transcript vaguely identifies a specific presenting concern of the family member from the session using solution-focused language and vaguely identifies a solution to the problem.
|
The transcript fully identifies a specific presenting concern of the family member from the session using solution-focused language and fully identifies a solution to the problem.
|
The transcript provides an advanced identification of a specific presenting concern of the family member from the session using solution-focused language and fully identifies a solution to the problem.
|
The transcript provides a comprehensive identification of a specific presenting concern of the family member from the session using solution-focused language and thoroughly identifies a solution to the problem.
|
35.0 %Part 2: Write a Mid-Treatment Letter to the Identified Family Member
|
The mid-treatment letter does not identify one member of the family whose dominant story could use some rewriting.
|
The mid-treatment letter vaguely identifies one member of the family whose dominant story could use some rewriting.
|
The mid-treatment letter fully identifies one member of the family whose dominant story could use some rewriting.
|
The mid-treatment letter provides an advanced identification of one member of the family whose dominant story could use some rewriting.
|
The mid-treatment letter provides a comprehensive identification of one member of the family whose dominant story could use some rewriting.
|
8.0 %Technical Skill
|
Execution does not meet the criteria outlined.
|
Execution is sloppy and unprofessional.
|
Execution needs improvement.
|
Execution is of good quality.
|
Execution is flawless. Demonstrates an in-depth, high-level of understanding.
|
8.0 %Presentation
|
The pieces are not neat or organized, and does not include all required elements.
|
The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements.
|
The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing.
|
The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements.
|
The work is well-presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.
|
4.0 %Research
|
No outside sources were used to support the assignment.
|
Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.
|
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, and/or timeliness.
|
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
|
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
|
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.
|
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
|
Sources are not documented.
|
Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
|
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
|
100 %Total Weightage
|
|